Friday, April 23, 2010

Bias in interpretations

The ex-ex Prime Minister was campaigning at Hulu Selangor, urging the voters not to trust a “frog” which might get drunk to represent them. Funny isn’t it. Why the “frog” can get drunk when he crosses over to another party while this very same “frog” can stay very much not intoxicated when he was then the cabinet minister just a couple of years ago.

And apparently the ex-ex Prime Minister also rears horses, 30 of them altogether but he is not racing them, so it is alright for him to keep his horses. On the other hand, the “frog” was accused of racing his horses thus the gambling “frog” should not be accepted by the voters. The question is, why the ex-ex Prime Minister raise up all these so-called unethical or whatever now but not a few years ago when the “frog” was still not a “frog”? Well, that’s typical bias in interpretations, that’s what politicians are good in.

No comments: